PROJECT Z7 · CONCEPT MODEL

The Z7 blockchain model

A deliberately narrow trust and coordination layer for number claims, wallet assignment, authorized transitions, integrity references and traceable history.

Purpose

The proposed Z7 blockchain is a shared trust and coordination layer. Its role is deliberately narrow: anchor number uniqueness, network-recognized control, authorized state transitions, integrity references and traceable history.

Candidate and claim

A number shown by a portal is only a candidate. It becomes occupied only when a valid claim is confirmed and the canonical state assigns it to a Z7 Wallet. Availability must therefore be revalidated at claim time.

Minimal state

A viable canonical record may contain the number, status, current authority, scoped delegation, protocol and state version, recovery-policy reference and the integrity reference of the active identity manifest. Extra fields belong on-chain only when every compatible implementation needs them for secure resolution.

REGISTRY

Canonical number

Claim, wallet assignment, status and state version.

AUTHORITY

Control

Owner, controllers, delegation and recovery.

INTEGRITY

Manifest reference

Versioned hash or content-addressed reference.

HISTORY

Transitions

Transfer, suspension, recovery and revocation.

Data placement

Names, descriptions, images, documents, messages, search indexes, prices, analytics and most application data normally remain distributed. The chain anchors the relation and integrity reference, not every piece of content.

Provenance

Interfaces must distinguish network-authoritative state, owner-authorized content, third-party attestations and resource-local information. These classes are not equally authoritative and must not be merged visually or technically.

NETWORK

Canonical state

Validated by protocol rules.

OWNER

Manifest content

Published under derived permissions.

ATTESTATION

External evidence

Scoped to issuer and revocation state.

RESOURCE

Local data

Search, prices, analytics and services.

Concept boundary

The whitepaper defines a target architecture, not a production protocol. Namespace rules, consensus, validators, fees, privacy, governance and launch details remain open until they are specified, implemented and tested.

Boundary: This resource visualizes the target model. It does not claim that unresolved protocol decisions are already implemented.